Trump to review Iran’s 14-point plan, but doubts over deal remain high

WASHINGTON/TEHRAN, May 3 — U.S. President Donald Trump said he will review a newly submitted 14-point proposal from Iran aimed at ending the ongoing conflict, though he signaled that reaching a deal remains unlikely.

Speaking to reporters before departing on Air Force One, Trump confirmed that the proposal had been received through mediators and would be examined soon, but added that he was not confident it would meet U.S. expectations.

The plan marks Iran’s latest attempt to revive diplomacy after weeks of military and economic escalation that have disrupted global energy markets and heightened fears of a broader regional war.

What is in Iran’s 14-point plan?

While full details have not been officially released, reports indicate that Iran’s proposal includes several key demands and conditions:

• Lifting of U.S. economic sanctions
• Removal or easing of the naval blockade
• Reopening of the Strait of Hormuz
• Unfreezing of Iranian financial assets
• Guarantees against future military attacks
• Delayed negotiations on nuclear issues

The proposal was sent in response to a U.S. framework plan and reflects Tehran’s preference for immediate de-escalation first, followed by longer-term negotiations.

However, Washington has taken a different position insisting that nuclear and missile issues must be addressed upfront.

Trump said he was “not satisfied” with the proposal and warned that Iran had “not yet paid a big enough price,” indicating that pressure on Tehran could continue.

He also left the door open for further military action if negotiations fail, saying the U.S. could resume strikes if Iran “misbehaves.”

This dual approach reviewing the plan while maintaining pressure — reflects Washington’s strategy of negotiating from a position of strength.

Talks remain far apart

The core issue remains a fundamental disagreement between the two sides:

U.S. position:

• Immediate nuclear restrictions
• Long-term security commitments
• Limits on regional influence

Iran’s position:

• Sanctions relief first
• End to military pressure
• Gradual negotiation process

This gap has repeatedly stalled talks, with both sides unwilling to make the first major concession.

Even as a temporary ceasefire holds, analysts say the situation remains fragile and could shift quickly if diplomacy breaks down.

Impact on global markets

The uncertainty surrounding the negotiations is already affecting global markets, particularly energy.

The Strait of Hormuz remains partially disrupted, impacting nearly 20% of global oil supply.

As a result:

• Oil prices remain elevated
• Shipping costs have increased
• Energy-importing countries face inflation pressure

Markets have reacted sharply to every headline, with prices rising on signs of tension and falling on diplomatic signals.

Role of Pakistan as mediator

Pakistan has emerged as a key diplomatic channel in the conflict, acting as an intermediary between Washington and Tehran.

The proposal was delivered through backchannel diplomacy involving Pakistani officials, highlighting the growing importance of regional players in global negotiations.

This indirect communication suggests that while official talks remain difficult, both sides are still engaged behind the scenes.

Strategic implications

The review of Iran’s plan comes at a critical moment in the conflict.

For the United States:

• It offers a chance to test diplomatic options
• But without compromising core demands

For Iran:

• It provides an opportunity to ease economic pressure
• While maintaining strategic leverage

However, both sides face risks:

• Prolonged conflict could damage global economies
• A failed negotiation could lead to renewed escalation

Final analysis

Trump’s decision to review the 14-point plan shows that diplomacy is still on the table — but only just.

The tone from Washington suggests that:

 A deal is possible but not likely without major changes

At the same time, Iran’s willingness to submit a detailed proposal indicates that it is also seeking a way out of the current crisis.

For now, the situation remains a delicate balance between negotiation and confrontation.