Trump Slams Iran’s Response to US Peace Proposal as ‘Totally Unacceptable’

89

Article Summary

  • US President Donald Trump rejected Iran’s latest response to Washington’s peace proposal.
  • Trump called Tehran’s counteroffer “totally unacceptable” in a Truth Social post.
  • Iran reportedly demanded sanctions relief, reopening of Hormuz and guarantees against future attacks.
  • The rejection increased fears the Gulf conflict could continue for weeks.
  • Oil prices surged as markets reacted to renewed uncertainty around the Strait of Hormuz.

WASHINGTON/DUBAI/TEHRAN, May 11 — U.S. President Donald Trump sharply rejected Iran’s latest response to Washington’s proposed peace framework on Monday, calling Tehran’s counteroffer “totally unacceptable” as fears grew that the 10-week Gulf conflict could continue without a breakthrough.

Trump made the remarks in a post on Truth Social shortly after Iran delivered its response through Pakistani mediators involved in ongoing ceasefire negotiations between the two countries.

“I have just read the response from Iran’s so-called representatives. I don’t like it TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!” Trump wrote, without publicly detailing which parts of Tehran’s proposal Washington opposed most strongly.

The strong response immediately raised concerns that fragile diplomatic efforts aimed at ending the war and reopening the Strait of Hormuz could be collapsing.


What Iran reportedly demanded

According to multiple reports, Iran’s proposal focused heavily on ending hostilities before discussing broader nuclear and regional issues.

Tehran reportedly demanded:

  • Full lifting of U.S. sanctions
  • Removal of the U.S. naval blockade in Hormuz
  • Guarantees against future attacks
  • Compensation for war damages
  • Restoration of unrestricted Iranian oil sales
  • Recognition of Iranian sovereignty in the Strait of Hormuz

Iran also reportedly resisted Washington’s demand for a long-term halt to uranium enrichment and the dismantling of nuclear facilities.

Instead, Tehran proposed a more limited arrangement involving temporary enrichment restrictions and transfer of some enriched uranium to a third country under specific conditions.


US pushing tougher nuclear conditions

The United States has insisted that any final agreement must include major restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program.

Washington’s reported demands include:

  • Long-term suspension of uranium enrichment
  • Removal of highly enriched uranium stockpiles
  • Dismantling of nuclear infrastructure
  • Broader limits on ballistic missile activity

Trump administration officials say the nuclear issue remains a non-negotiable “red line” for Washington.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also warned over the weekend that the conflict could not fully end unless Iran’s enrichment facilities and missile capabilities were addressed permanently.


Oil prices surge after Trump’s rejection

Energy markets reacted immediately to Trump’s comments.

Oil prices reportedly jumped by around $3 per barrel after investors concluded the diplomatic deadlock could prolong instability in the Gulf and keep shipping routes near the Strait of Hormuz partially disrupted.

The Strait of Hormuz normally carries roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil supply, making it one of the most important energy chokepoints on Earth.

Shipping through the region remains heavily reduced following:

  • Naval clashes
  • Drone attacks
  • Commercial vessel disruptions
  • Competing maritime blockades

Analysts warn that prolonged instability could continue increasing:
👉 Oil prices
👉 Shipping insurance costs
👉 Global inflation pressure


Ceasefire remains fragile

Trump’s rejection comes at a time when the ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran already appears increasingly unstable.

Recent days have seen:

  • Drone incidents across Gulf states
  • Clashes near Hormuz
  • Continued fighting involving Hezbollah in Lebanon
  • New warnings from Tehran about foreign naval operations

Iranian officials have insisted they will not “bow down” under pressure and warned they would continue defending national interests in the Gulf.

Meanwhile, Washington has continued military deployments in the region while also pushing diplomatic efforts through Pakistan and Qatar.


Pakistan remains central mediator

Pakistan continues playing a key role in communication between Tehran and Washington.

Iran reportedly transmitted its latest response through Pakistani intermediaries, who remain heavily involved in efforts to prevent a total collapse of negotiations.

Diplomatic sources say mediators are still trying to secure:

  • A longer ceasefire
  • Maritime security guarantees
  • Future nuclear negotiations
  • Reopening of shipping lanes in Hormuz

However, Trump’s latest remarks suggest major disagreements remain unresolved.


Political pressure growing inside US

The conflict is also creating growing domestic pressure inside the United States.

Recent polls cited in U.S. media suggest many Americans oppose prolonged military involvement in the Gulf, particularly as gasoline prices and inflation continue rising.

The Trump administration is reportedly exploring measures to reduce fuel costs while continuing diplomatic efforts to stabilize the region.

At the same time, some Republican lawmakers and defense officials continue pushing for a harder stance against Tehran.


Final analysis

Trump’s rejection of Iran’s latest peace response highlights just how far apart both sides still remain after weeks of negotiations.

For now:

  • Diplomacy continues
  • The ceasefire technically survives
  • Hormuz remains unstable
  • Oil markets remain nervous
  • Military escalation risks remain high

Whether negotiations eventually recover or the conflict slides back toward wider war may depend on whether Washington and Tehran can bridge their biggest divide: Iran’s nuclear future and control of the Strait of Hormuz.

What Could Happen Next?

1. More negotiations: Pakistan and Qatar may continue pushing both sides toward compromise.

2. Oil prices remain volatile: Continued uncertainty in Hormuz could keep energy markets unstable.

3. Ceasefire weakens further: More clashes could erupt if diplomacy stalls.

4. Pressure on Iran increases: Washington could expand sanctions and naval operations.

5. Nuclear dispute deepens: Uranium enrichment remains the biggest obstacle to a final deal.